| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
92
   |
Posted - 2013.09.24 09:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 8, 12.
Are we seriously doing this? You guys really think this story ends well?
Hell, now I'm tempted to make an alt to do this ****. |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
92
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 10:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
He'll be at 20 next month. Love the "I have no reason to steal your isk" bit too. Even the stupidest person ought to be able to think of 12,000,000,000 reasons to steal 12b (13.2b given the interest he wouldn't have to pay). But this guy is acting like he literally cannot understand why anyone would ever want to have isk instead of other people having the isk. Let's all invest in the least imaginative, least profit driven trader in eve. |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
93
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 15:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
The Greenmachine Greenmachine wrote:X ATM092 wrote:He'll be at 20 next month. Love the "I have no reason to steal your isk" bit too. Even the stupidest person ought to be able to think of 12,000,000,000 reasons to steal 12b (13.2b given the interest he wouldn't have to pay). But this guy is acting like he literally cannot understand why anyone would ever want to have isk instead of other people having the isk. Let's all invest in the least imaginative, least profit driven trader in eve. don't worry OP this guy is clearly butthurt hahahaha also, if chribba decided to steal the first titan that passed through his hands he wouldn't have made anything CLOSE to the amount of isk he now has. good fail is good 
hahahaha |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
94
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 14:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
On the other hand it's possible for one scammer to have created several MD personas to act as shills filling the first few of his loans to move things along when regular MD people wouldn't have touched them. That would explain why the same few guys show up in the obviously a scam topics over and over while also adding some faith in humanity. |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
102
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Scenario A
Make 12b a month, also steal 12b
Scenario B
Make 12b a month, don't steal anything
It appears to me that there is a 12b incentive to do scenario A, even if you make 12b a month. Can I get someone to double check my numbers here? |
X ATM092
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
"Why would I take 12.2B when I can easily make that and more per month?. Maybe you don't understand the concept of you have to have ISK to make ISK."
In your previous posts you were explaining that you literally could not see any kind of reason why you might want to take 12b that you had the ability to take because you were earning 12b. However as the above research into scenario A and scenario B shows your earnings are in fact not relevant to the analysis of the decision about whether or not to take 12b. Indeed scenario A, in which the isk is taken, shows a 12b profit over scenario B, in which it is not, no matter how much you earn per month. Also if you earn 12b a month the fact that you apparently need to make uncollateralised loans is very strange, that ought to not be a significant portion of your trading portfolio and even if you had investments tied in illiquid assets you should still be able to offer those as collateral with a third party.
If, as you say, you have to have isk to make isk then wouldn't that mean that by keeping (also known as having) the isk of the investors you would make more isk. After all repaying the loan is giving the isk back which is the opposite of having it. If we take your theory regarding having isk and making isk and use it to calculate the impact of ceasing to have isk (also known as giving it away or back) then it would imply the unmaking of isk. Indeed the opportunity cost of repaying the isk could be many times the isk value that was actually repaid. |
| |
|